Skip to main content

Volvete atrevido – Transformá a tu novia en tu putita personal


You’re in a LTR and you want to spice up your sex life. Or you have a few plates and you want them to be so sexually addicted to you that you can do no wrong. Here is how.


The way to a woman’s pussy is through her mind. If you possess her mind, you possess her pussy and heart. Patrice was right on point when he said that. So how do you possess a woman’s mind? By giving her the best, most dominant sex she’s ever had.

We see posts here all the time about women complaining that their husbands/boyfriends/etc aren’t dominant enough in bed. In a lot of these cases, the woman ends up cheating on their «significant other» with some random dude. Why? Because the random dude knows how to fuck.

Sex is about dominance. If you’re not dominanting a (normal, healthy) woman in bed, she’s not going to enjoy it. Here are a few ways you can become more dominant in bed. All of these techniques have been field tested.

  • Spanking. This is the most elementary way to do it, and you should start here. Doggy style? Cowgirl? Spank that ass lightly and see how she reacts. If it’s new to her, she may not be overly enthusiastic at first, but after a couple of tries she’ll be begging you to keep doing it. I got my girl’s booty completely red once, and I haven’t heard her complain about it once.
  • Pulling her hair. Once you’ve given your gal a good spanking, get a little more dominant. Reach out with your hand at the back of her head, and grab a good amount of her hair there, as close to the base of her hair as you can. Pull gently just enough to bring her head back a bit. Don’t worry, it won’t hurt her if you grab a good amount of hair. You are not grabbing the ends of her hair, stick closer to the roots. Enjoy the moans.
  • Light Choking. Once you’ve explored spanking and hair pulling, and she enjoyed it, you opened up a bit of your woman’s wild side, so you can try to push the envelope and get a little more rough with her. Place your hand on her throat, applying light pressure ONLY on the sides where the arteries are, NOT on her wind pipe. Try it on yourself first, the effect is profound. You don’t need much force. Remember, dominance is more about the psychological than the physical. Do this while you’re fucking her in missionary, or cowgirl. You can try reaching from behind during doggy but you have to be very careful about that wind pipe. Note: this is how I got my virgin girlfriend to cum from PIV for the first time. She’s since turned into a total pornstar in bed, and we’ve only been together for 2.5 months.
  • Permission to cum, Sir. Whether you’re fingering her, fucking her, or eating her pussy, have her tell you when she’s getting close. Then tell her she must ask for your permission before she cums. Make her beg for it for a while, asking her do you need it? How badly do you need it? Then finally tell her to be a good girl and cum for you. You can also never give her permission and stimulate her harder. If she can’t hold it back and cums, that’s how you know you’re doing a good job. At the end, hold her close and whisper in her ear that she’s a Good Girl, and that you are very pleased with her.
  • Pillow on her face. One day I’m having sex with my girl, and I didn’t feel like choking her, so I came up with the next best thing. We were surrounded by four pillows, and so I grab one and put it over her head, and applied gentle pressure on it. Mix that with fucking her hard, and she came within 60 seconds. Some variations of this I’ve tried: I don’t want you to look at me while I fuck you and cover her face up, letting the pillow rest without pressure on it. Experiment, have fun with it.
  • Anal play #1. So you want to have anal sex with your girl? Don’t be a pussy and lick that asshole. If she’s not hygienic about it, dump her and replace her with a clean model. My girl and I would be walking on campus, and she just loves it when I pull her into a corner, lift up her skirt (or pull her yoga pants down) and give her a few good licks. Once done, I’ll say something like come on hurry up already we’re gonna be late to class. You can have fun and make her say please pcadrian lick my ass I need it before you do it. My girl literally told me after the first time I licked her ass that she likes it because it feels naughty/dirty.
  • Anal play #2. Licking is the first step to getting her warmed up to anal sex. Fingering is the next. But you can’t just stick it in alone, you must couple it with either clitoral stimulation (eat her pussy during) or with G spot stimulation. The ass is going to amplify those sensations for her. Coconut oil is key here – the best lubricant for any sort of sex I’ve ever used. Vaginal, anal, you name it, coconut oil is universal. So next time you fingerfuck your girl, stick a finger up her ass (one had pussy, one hand ass, be sanitary about it). When she’s aroused, make her say out loud I’m a dirty slut and I love getting fucked in the ass pcadrian. Make her repeat that phrase until she cums. Don’t worry, she won’t be offended (if she is, DUMP her immediately).
  • Anal sex. Once your girl gets accustomed to anal play and is enjoying it, you’ve played with butt plugs (small first, then medium, build up to your dick size), it’s time for full on anal sex. Do some research, there’s many details here and I could write an entire post about it, but I don’t have time. The only tips I can give is: coconut oil, lots of coconut oil, and she MUST stimulate her clit during. Also, don’t forget to wash and pee after, thoroughly.
  • Shirt blindfold. When you take off her shirt, don’t take it off all the way. Leave it over her head, lift it up just enough to uncover her mouth, but leave her eyes covered so she can’t see. Kiss/lick her while you’re fucking her. When you cum, make her stick her tongue out and cum on it. She’s going to love every drop.
  • Cum play. When you cum on her stomach/ass/tits/etc, pick some up with your finger and have her taste it. Tell her the two of you are one now, that you want her to carry a part of you with her throughout the day. Doesn’t get more romantic than that. BTW this is how you get her to be OK with swallowing. Last night I introduced my girl to car sex, and after I finished on her stomach, I told her: you’re going to have to eat all of it, I didn’t bring any tissues for cleanup. Next thing I know, she’s lapping it up with her finger. She got most of it, and let the rest air dry. It was beautiful to watch.
  • Cum play #2. Women have an innate biological drive to make babies. So if you’re in a LTR (I’d be afraid to do this with plates), gently introduce the thought of you cumming innside her: you know what would feel really good right now, if I finished inside you, I want you to feel my cock pulsing and shooting my cum inside your pussy. Track your woman’s cycle (install the app Clue on your phone), and when she’s way outside the fertility window (eg she’s on her period), give her a nice big load. Of course, talk to her beforehand and explain to her how female fertility works (you do know this, don’t you? if not, read up on it). She has to be comfortable with the idea, and know that she won’t get pregnant. WARNING: within a couple of weeks, SHE WILL WANT TO GET PREGNANT so bad it will make her head spin. My girl is constantly telling me to finish inside her while she’s ovulating, and how badly she wants to give me a baby. Once you unleash this instinct in your woman, there is no way to put the beast back in the cage. So thread carefully with this one.
  • Other fantasies. I was working out with my girl once, and the program I have her on has glute bridges at the end. On her last set, I go between her legs, and tell her to keep going. My cock is rock hard, and as she’s moving up/down, I let it touch her pussy. That’s when I introduced the fantasy of Fuck The Gym Girl to her. Needless to say the sex was incredibly hot, both of us were sweaty as fuck, and I came within minutes. Other fantasies are Fuck The School Girl (I teach math). I don’t know what else we tried.. but don’t be afraid to get creative. If you want to play Fuck The MILF At The Park, then do so. Remember, if you’re enjoying it, she’s enjoying it too. Women are biologically wired to please their Alpha.


  • Women want to be dominanted in bed. Be the Alpha, or be the cuck. Your choice.
  • If your woman is not receptive to even the slightest bit of dominance (spanking), you are not her Alpha. She just doesn’t see you that way. It has nothing to do with her background (my girl was the sweetest, most conservative gal before she met me). Lift more, read more TRP, and if that doesn’t work, dump her and start over with a new one.
  • Don’t be afraid to experiment (safely). What I have listed above are just a few ideas meant to get you started. The possibilities are endless.
  • Don’t forget to HAVE FUN. These are techniques, but for me they arise naturally. Don’t go about it like a nerd who’s calculating every move. Get in touch with that inner animal, and ravage her.
  • If you’re interested in G spot stimulation, /u/Clint_Redwood just released a great article on How To Make a Girl Squirt. Read it.

Stay smooth fellas!

(enlace al original en ingles)

Relación a Largo Plazo – Parte 1 – Cómo mantener el relato

Vos vas a ser la calma. Vas a ser la calma antes de la tormenta, la calma en el centro de la tormenta y la calma que destruye inevitablemente a la tormenta.

Como decimos acá bastante segudo en todo contexto que tenga que ver con las mujeres, mantener el relato es crucial para la estabilidad y duracion de la atraccion en la relacion. Este es un racconto sujetivo de mis ideas sobre el tema.

I’m a big supporter of LTR’s for myself. I’ve never lacked in success with women and never had a thick set of beta traits that hamstrung my goals, but I also didn’t always succeed. Some of the ways in which I absolutely failed before was maintaining frame. A man needs to be perceived as strong and immovable in what he wants, at all times, even if this sometimes ruffles feathers. The discomfort a woman may experience over your stubbornness is almost always temporary but comes down to the issues you’re being stubborn about, don’t be a stubborn jackass over anything and everything like a temperamental child. When your partner gets a feel for how single-minded you are in procuring and protecting your genuine interests, she will eventually link this to your desire for her. As an aside I wouldn’t advise telling your partner how seriously dedicated you are to them unless you also detail the consequences for shattering your expectations with things like disrespect, cheating, and good old mutiny. You are the captain, and if your crew attempts to subvert your authority, you will decisively correct and/or obtain a new crew.

This actually begs a metaphor that I’ve enjoyed and may help you understand relationships a bit better. You are the captain, and each of your two dozen crew members are different aspects of your partners personality. You encourage some to work harder, correct any of them that get out of line, and you work as a team to achieve your goals. This said, if there is a failure in your crew, then you have failed them in some way. For those who believe that women have no honor, are immature in their mindset, that they can never truly love you- then you should agree with me more than others who don’t. You are 100% responsible for the ships successes and failures. If you fail to have a clear mission, to be seen as a successful and competent Captain, to look after the needs (not necessarily the wants) of each of your crew members, and reward your crew commensurately- you should not be surprised if you find yourself vying for control, or they leave entirely.

As is also often said here, you must establish an accurate image of what you want early on in the courtship process. This usually includes a heavy emphasis on sexuality as that’s partially a requirement for men who agree to be tied down even if they actively seek a long term partner. It’s easy to find a bad relationship with an unpreferable woman, I’m sure a majority of us have experienced this, but it’s much different to find an appropriate or near optimal partner and be sure she falls in line to the tune of your desired relationship structure and goals for it.

I’m a stoic man, not a lot phases me, and I find this to be CRUCIAL to success. Consistently pulling and keeping your partner inside the frame of your expectations is great, but maintaining your own frame is of the UTMOST. You don’t always need to be leading explicitly or trying to nudge your partner into compliance, you need to be put together well enough on your exterior that she desires to follow and doesn’t need implicit or explicit nudging to meet your needs and desires- you want the crew that wishes to honor all the strength you show and give to them by association. Stoicism does not mean you have to be unemotional, but my expressions are strictly constrained to positive and neutral emotional states. Stoicism consistently exhibits a quiet strength that people notice, and it has subtle effects on the people around me. If you slip into more neutral behaviors like being quiet or slightly withdrawn, it’s taken very seriously by people who respect you because they KNOW by experience that you’re not given to emotional displays. Without much expressive effort on your part, your partner or anyone else who knows you will begin to think about what may be going through your mind, and will often seek to address.

As I said, the biggest way I’ve failed before was because of losing my frame, and dropping my stoicism as well as my leadership out of weakness was an enormous hinge to why my partners had lost respect for me because they had come to rely on that strength. When I stopped exhibiting only positive and neutral emotions, this consistently ruined the feeling that our relationship was a net positive, she had little patience for the new contrast. Even if this was not at all true in an objective sense, the feeling that I was failing meant I was a failure. The feeling that I was weak meant I was weak. The feeling that I was acting unnecessarily emotional meant I was unnecessarily emotional. If, as this sub posits so often, the feels dictate the actions of women and form the content of their opinions (see: rationalization hamster), then anything she thinks or feels of you is YOUR responsibility to inform by example. Don’t think women can be objective? Then you already accept that EVERY failure is yours.

You have to be immovable so that she feels safe when her emotions roam, and to heed your guidance. She will be tied to your centered disposition, and you can always tug her back toward you to limit her stress and emotional fallout. I’ve insinuated myself so well that I don’t have to do much in order to have this effect on my current relationship. Something as small as «Stop it.» or «This isn’t a big deal» is enough to encourage my partner to venture back toward the center, and reduce negative emotional content. In my relationship I always get her to ease up, and to rely on my strength and reason to help her every single time.

Maintaining frame is a dynamic thing, one can’t be told PUA like steps to making sure you’re on the straight and narrow. There are two primary points I want you to keep in mind at all times.


You are a man.

You are her captain.

Treat your crew well, but do not tolerate insubordination. Your behavior matters first and foremost, you are 100% responsible. Failure anywhere on the ship is your responsibility. Once negative behaviors are largely curtailed in favor of mutually constructive actions and respect, you can navigate and achieve much more successfully as a unit.

(Enlace al original en ingles)

Ser un Tipo Bueno es una forma de extremismo

Hay dos extremos en la vida… El tipo bueno™ y el Forro™

El Tipo bueno™ no sabe que es un extremista. Su mente fue lavada por el proceso de indoctrinacion Blue Pill para que piense de una sola manera y eso hace que su forma de ver la vida no sea balanceada.

El Forro™ es el tipo que esta completamente separado de la mentalidad de la mañada. Literalmente le chupan un huevo los demas. A las mujeres les atrae esto porque representa el extremo opuesto del Tipo bueno™, sin embargo reconocen que si es puramente un Forro™, no hay chances de domarlo para novio… ninguna.

Las mujeres tienen dos pruebas para ver los extremos:

  • Prueba de mierda – Esto prueba si hay demasiada compasión.
  • Prueba de confort – Esto prueba si hay demasiada severidad.

Las mujeres no tienen una realidad propia. Solo reflejan la realidad del hombre con quien se enganchan. El acceso a hombres que demuestran un conocimiento de ambos extremos es el ideal para las mujeres y es por eso que emplean ambas pruebas.


El Tipo bueno™ representa el extremo de tener demasiada compasión… el extremista beta.

El Forro™ tiene una actitud IDGAF (no me importa nada) que hace que las mujeres sientan una atraccion inicial hacia el, pero su severidad en relacion con los demas (puro ego) hace que no tenga suficiente confort. Va a cabalgar la pija de Juan Chotalarga (Chad Thundercock) porque representa el anti-Tipo Bueno™ pero sabe que no hay manera de que pueda conseguir una pareja de él. (su objetivo es obtenerlo)

La mujer desea un hombre balanceado… ni puro beta, ni puro forro.

La mujer se adapta a si misma en torno a su hombre.

El hombre debe recompensar y castigar tanto con compasión como con severidad, ya que esto es lo que significa la masculinidad.

(enlace al original en ingles)


El matrimonio y la Religión


El instinto mas básico del humano es el de reproducirse. Pero ambos sexos tienen características diferentes que hacen que sus estrategias para reproducirse sean diferentes.

  • La estrategia sexual masculina es la de reproducirse con todas las mujeres que pueda, por el método que sea necesario.
  • La estrategia sexual femenina es la de reproducirse con el mejor perfil genético que consiga, y lograr que ademas la ayuden durante los años que dura la gestión y crianza de sus hijos.

Se puede ver claramente que la estrategia del hombre y de la mujer están enfrentadas.

La idea del matrimonio es común en todas las religiones, y tiene una raíz fuertemente biológica:

  • El hombre necesita confirmar que se reprodujo
  • La mujer necesita de un hombre que la asista en la crianza

¿Cual es la forma más optima de cumplir con ambos objetivos? Que ambas partes cedan para el bien común.


Y así surge la idea del matrimonio, en común, todas las religiones coinciden con lo mismo.

  • La mujer entrega su exclusividad sexual
  • El hombre entrega la exclusividad de su productividad

En si, la mujer entrega su capacidad reproductiva a cambio de que el hombre la proteja, y asista en la crianza de sus hijos. Con ese compromiso ambos obtienen algo que necesitan, el hombre se asegura que los hijos son suyos, y la mujer se asegura que va a recibir ayuda durante el embarazo y la crianza.

  • En la concepción original del matrimonio no existía el concepto de divorcio.
  • En la concepción original del matrimonio los hijos eran del hombre, sean o no de él, todos los hijos que producía su esposa eran su responsabilidad.
  • En la concepción original del matrimonio si la esposa no podía tener hijos se anulaba el matrimonio.
  • En la concepción original del matrimonio si la mujer era infiel se la podía castigar de múltiples maneras, desde la muerte, hasta el divorcio y la expulsión del a sociedad.

Analicemos estos conceptos y veamos las razones, te va a abrir los ojos para ver las relaciones actuales, mas allá del matrimonio o la religión.


El divorcio no era una opción, en parte como protección a la mujer que había entregado su fertilidad a cambio de protección, esto impedía que los hombres la utilizaran para hacer hijos y luego quiten su parte del «acuerdo».


Los hijos del matrimonio eran del hombre, si había algún tipo de separación o divorcio el hombre se quedaba con la responsabilidad de ellos. Esto era una espada de doble filo, por un lado como un paracaídas de protección para la mujer, ya que en caso de que el divorcio sucediera, por lo menos no quedaba con la responsabilidad de proteger, alimentar y cuidar de ellos.


Nada deja mas en claro el tipo de acuerdo que era el matrimonio que esta cuestión. El hombre y la mujer se juntaban con el objetivo de que el hombre se asegure la reproducción, si la mujer no podía darle hijos el acuerdo quedaba sin efecto. Un matrimonio que no podía tener hijos era considerado algo terrible, y en algunas religiones como el Judaísmo el hombre tiene prohibido no tener mínimo dos hijos, es su obligación reproducirse.


Otra cuestión que deja bien en claro las razones por las que hombres y mujeres contraían matrimonio. Si una mujer era infiel eso ponía en riesgo la posibilidad del hombre de reproducirse, después de todo podía quedar embarazada de otro hombre y el esposo no enterarse que estaba criando hijos que no tenían sus genes. El castigo era acorde a lo importante que es para el hombre asegurarse su propia reproducción.


Consejos de gimnasio – los primeros días en el gimnasio

Leíste en internet, entraste en el blog, te informaste, leíste libros, hablaste con conocidos, has visto videos y te has convencido de que tienes que comenzar a ir al gimnasio.

Te has convencido de que el gimnasio es importante para ti, que quieres verte fuerte, musculoso.
Te has convencido que quieres verte como un hombre y no como una mujer ni como una babosa.
Ya has juntado la fuerza de voluntad para ir a anotarte en el gimnasio y estás ansioso por empezar.
Has leído sobre rutinas has entrado en la sección correspondiente y has abogado lo que vas a hacer este primer día.
¿Estás listo para empezar?
Claro que NO.
Mover pesos en el aire tiene consecuencias en el cuerpo que es importante conocer. No solo tu cuerpo adapta tus músculos para poder mover esos pesos sino también los huesos, el sistema nervioso, la coordinación entre los músculos y el cerebro
Ir el primer día y agarrar una barra y empezar a moverla puede no ser la mejor de las ideas.
El cuerpo humano necesita siempre adaptarse a lo que le tiren, y la musculación y el ejercicio no son ninguna excepción.
Pensando en eso, te presento aquí la Rutina Básica de los Primeros Días.
Aclaración importante: no soy un profesional de la salud, no tomes estás ideas como correcta, ante cualquier duda consulta a tu médico y/o profesor.


Hay cuatro grupos musculares principales en el cuerpo, y por supuesto hay un ejercicio especializado en sacar el mejor provecho de cada uno de ellos.
  • Brazos
  • Pecho
  • Espalda
  • Piernas
Lo que harás el primer mes de ejercicio es una rutina simple que irá adaptando tu cuerpo y dejarlo listo para comenzar con todo en el gimnasio.
Es una rutina de 5 días, lunes a viernes, pensada para hacer en 30 minutos.
Todos los ejercicios musculares están pensados para empezar el primer día haciendo 3 series de 4 repeticiones. Puede parecerte fácil, pero cada día que puedas hacer 3×4, aumentarás en 1 repetición por serie.
Así, Lunes 3×4, Miércoles 3×5, Viernes 3×6 y siguiente Lunes 3×7
Cuando llegues a 3×12 agrega más peso o una serie más 3×12 -> 4×8
Descansa un minuto y medio entre serie y serie.
Si la serie te costó, espera 3 minutos.
Si fallas la serie, es decir no llegas a hacer todas las repeticiones, descansa 5 minutos.

Día 1 – Lunes

  • Calentamiento: 20 jumping jacks
  • Sentadillas con tu cuerpo
  • Flexiones de brazos
  • Tríceps
  • Remo con máquina
  • Dominadas en dorsalera
  • Plancha 3 intentos a lo que llegues máximo 1 minuto por vez
  • Termina el día elongando

Día 2 – Martes

  • 20 jumping jacks de calentamiento
  • Entrenamiento HIIT «La Rutina de Un Minuto«
  • Corre al máximo que puedas durante 20 segundos. Tienes que dar todo en esos segundos.
  • Descansa haciendo una actividad físicamente liviana por 3 minutos.
  • Repite el proceso hasta haber hecho tres veces la corrida a máxima intensidad de 20 segundos. En total ejercitaste 60 segundos a máxima intensidad.
  • Termina el entrenamiento con 2 minutos de ejercicio muy liviano.

Día 3 – Miércoles

  • Repite el día 1, si lograste hacer 3 series de 4 repeticiones en algún ejercicio, aumenta 1 repetición en cada serie. Es decir, haz 3 series de 5 repeticiones.

Día 4 – Jueves

  • Repite el día 2

Día 5 – Viernes

  • Repite el día 1, aumenta en uno las repeticiones que hiciste el día 3, si pudiste haber 3 series de 5 repeticiones, haz 3 series de 6 repeticiones.
Recuerda que esta rutina sólo está pensada para empezar en el gimnasio, es para utilizar el primer mes y para que vayas acostumbrándote al gimnasio. Luego de llegar a 3×12 en todos los ejercicios deberías probar con una rutina de verdad como la 5×5.

Con esta rutina:

Creas la costumbre de ir a diario al gimnasio, puedes ir al mediodía tranquilamente ya que al durar poco puedes hacerla en la hora del almuerzos
Vas conociendo el gimnasio y quienes ejercitan allí a diario. Que los demás te vean todos los días ayudará a que te tomen en serio.
Aprenderás lo que es la carga progresiva, siempre deberás aumentar el esfuerzo.
Aprenderás la forma de algunos de los ejercicios más importantes del gimnasio.
Espero te sea útil.
Comenta cómo te fue.

Ritos de pasaje – Convirtiendo a un niño en Hombre

Rites of Passage – Making Boys into Men
Quite often when we think of “Rites of Passage” the image of a primitive society performing some bizarre ritual comes to mind, such as the Vanuatu Land Divers.

«Both a harvest ritual and a rite of passage amongst the tribes of the small pacific island of Vanuatu, land diving is now a tourist phenomenon. The men who live on Pentecost Island in Vanuatu, climb a rickety 98-foot-tall (30-meter) tower, tie vines to their ankles and dive to the ground, falling at speeds around 45 mph (72 kph). When a dive goes correctly, the person gets close enough to touch his shoulders or his head to the earth. However, unlike bungee jumping, these vines aren’t elastic and a miscalculation in vine length could lead to broken legs, cracked skulls, or even death. Boys once they have been circumcised at about age 7 or 8 begin participating, though they usually are permitted to jump from a shorter tower. As a boy makes his first dive, his mother holds an item representing his childhood. When he jumps, she throws the item away. Divers also refrain from sex the day before they jump — legend says it will cause the jump to go badly.» — 10 Bizarre Rites of Passage
I, however, would argue that rites of passage are actually more of a sign of an advanced society. It is patriarchy that builds civilization. Patriarchy is the idea of «putting sex to work,» which is based on the ancient contract of marriage. The ancient contract of marriage is an economic contract whereby a woman «sells» her sexual reproductive abilities to a man (ie. the children of marriage are his children, not hers) in return for the superior protection and providing abilities a man can, and will, procure once yoked to children of his own. What does this have to do with rites of passage, you ask? Well, in order for men to be attractive to women, a man must surpass the female so that he has some tangible benefit to offer the female which she either cannot do herself, or is unwilling to do herself, and therefore fulfill Briffault’s law:

“The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.” — Robert Briffault, The Mothers, I, 191
It is the nature of the female’s mothering instinct to be 100% totalitarian. Small children need this type of totalitarianism or they would soon get themselves into all sorts of trouble. Thus every boy starts off life completely dominated by a female and it takes a decisive change to escape his mother’s gravity field and grow into a man so that the next generation of women will have men to marry. For all the ballyhooing in the media of «the man-child» and for all the haughty snipes of women at males to «be a man,» they don’t seem to understand that in order to be a man, he cannot behave like a woman. Our thoroughly feminized society has relentlessly propagandized us to believe «the right way» for humans to behave is «the female way» while at the same time has attacked and derided everything that once defined masculinity as «macho» and unfavourable.
Click Pic for «Sex Sells (Hypergamy Explained)»
Just as children are not equal to adults, men are not equal to women – a «man,» who is a man in the true sense of the word, has surpassed the level of women and has grown beyond it. This fulfills Briffault’s law and also enforces the hypergamy which women need to be exposed to in order to be sexually attracted to a man. Thus, a family hierarchy develops – and this hierarchy works… we know it works because we have historical evidence of it working for centuries in our very own Western Culture – the family as based upon the Bible.

Man –> Woman –> Children

It’s the natural order of things. Women take care of themselves and children, and men take care of themselves, women and children. It does not work in reverse.

Lots of women spit and fume about this, but what they are forgetting when they are told Biblically to submit to their husbands, is that husbands are also commanded to submit to God, or to The Truth. And as Jesus pointed out, to rule is to serve. Thus, this is the proper ordering of human existence if we are to live above that of the beasts of the field. Only when a man lives in proper accordance to The Truth can he expect a woman to be in proper relation to him.

God/Truth –> Man –> Woman –> Children
Click Pic for «Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager in the House»
In reality, there is no such thing as equality. All relationships are hierarchical in one way or another. Sometimes they change, or often what is going on underneath is entirely different than what appears on the surface. The men who stood on the deck of the Titanic so that their women could survive is an example of how the underlying hierarchy is often different than the social appearance of hierarchy.

«But what difference does it make whether women rule, or the rulers are ruled by women? The result is the same.» — The Politics of Aristotle, The Spartan Women

«Equality» really only has meaning in relation to the sphere of human law – in the realm that all people are equal before the law in regard to their rights as put forth by the American Founding Fathers: The rights to self-ownership, life, liberty and property. Certainly not the «right» to a job, an education or free healthcare.
Click Pic for «You’re Such a Tool (Briffault’s law)»
«Men» are not on the same level as women. When men consider themselves «equal» to women, they are resented and disrespected by women. The sexes are different, and thus need different things from each-other. Women need men to be their tool in society, and therefore men have to bring something to women that women cannot do themselves. (Watch how birds court each-other) Thus, if he remains «equal» to a woman, she has no use for him. A «man» has to graduate beyond the level of women – if he doesn’t he will be completely flattened by women when he encounters them. It is women’s natural right to be in authority over children but it is not right for women to be in control over men. If a man behaves as a boy and relates to his wife as «Is it OK for me to be me, Mommy?» he is not a man equal to women – he is beneath them. This is what happens in many marriages today – the husband ends up treating his wife as his mother, and as such she begins to resent him. How can something that is her own creation (a boy, a child) be equal to its creator?
«Mothers find in their children satisfaction for their desire to dominate, a possession, an occupation, something that is wholly intelligible to them and can be chattered with: the sum of all this is what mother love is; it is to be compared with an artist’s love for his work. Pregnancy has made women kinder, more patient, more timid, more pleased to submit; and just so does spiritual pregnancy produce the character of the contemplative type, which is closely related to the feminine character: it consists of male mothers.» — Freiderich Nietzsche
Click Pic for «The Suffragettes versus The Truth»
Only when boys separate from the totalitarian power of the Mother and grow into men do they truly have a sphere to address women and from which women respect them as men. However, women instinctively try to prevent boys from leaving their field of power – children are women’s «possessions» and who wants to lose a possession? To mother, he will always be «her little boy.» Also, it is not wrong for it to be a struggle to escape the totalitarianism of mother, for manhood not «won» is not manhood at all. Women cannot show boys how to become men because it is an entirely foreign concept to them – just as children cannot show adults how to behave because adulthood is something children simply don’t understand. Women are instinctively uncomfortable with competition and conflict, which might cause people’s feelings to get hurt, and thus, they try to prevent boys from growing away from their field of influence and into men.

«Women and men want very different things and therefore very different worlds. Men want sex, freedom, and adventure; women want security, pleasantness, and someone to care about (or for) them. Both like power. Men use it to conquer their neighbors whether in business or war, women to impose security and pleasantness. … Just about everything that once defined masculinity is now denounced as ‘macho,’ a hostile word embodying the female incomprehension of men. … Men are happy for men to be men and women to be women; women want us all to be women.» — Fred Reed

Women want us all to be women – or children – because that is what they understand. They have no comprehension of «men» or what it takes to be a man. Children deprived of their fathers through divorce are horribly abused in this way, for they get «aborted» at the female/child stage of development and have far greater challenges «growing into men» and learning how to address women in any other way than seeking the approval of mother.
Click Pic for «A Guide to Birdwatching»

Along with the thorough feminization of our culture, so have we removed many of the aspects that used to make boys into men, and in turn we are finding that there are less and less «men» for women to want to associate with. Once a woman enters into a male institution, it immediately becomes feminized – thus we now even see that girls are allowed into the Boy Scouts. Men and boys need to have places separate from women where they can meet and be men, free from female influence.

Learning self-reliance and self-confidence is essential for boys. Thus things such as camping and learning how to build fires from scratch are good builders of character for young boys. Women are creatures who depend upon others, but men are creatures who must depend solely upon themselves. Not only must they depend upon themselves, but they must also be able to depend on themselves in excess, or they will not become sufficient «tools» for the next generation of women.
Clic Pic for «Ritalin and Abusive Schools»
In our feminized school systems, when children play sports like soccer they no longer keep score so that the children’s feelings will not be hurt by being «losers.» This again undermines masculinity. When I was a kid, I played on a soccer team and we were the worst team in the league. I don’t think we won a single game all season – but our coach did a very good job with us in teaching us how to lose gracefully. It builds a boy’s character to lose and accept it. Many endeavors a man takes on in life will not be successful, but learning how to lose gives him the confidence to try anyway… and if he keeps on trying because he is not afraid of losing, sooner or later he will find success. Our schools are «aborting» boys development by robbing them of the opportunity to lose – and when they can’t figure out why boys aren’t developing properly, they fill them with Ritalin rather than addressing the fact that boys and girls are different, and need different strategies to develop.

Learning to deal with the bully is also a rite of passage for many boys. I remember as a young boy when my father taught me how to stand up to the bully. I had gone to a private Christian school as a child and there was this one kid named Peter who was constantly bullying me. He was two grades higher than me and bigger than me. One weekend we were at a church camp-out, shortly before my 11th birthday, and Peter started picking on me and shoving me around in his usual way. I remember I went running back to find my Dad and told him what was going on.

My dad told me, «Boy, there’s just some times that you are gonna have to take care of these things on your own.»

I still remember his words, and in fact, have followed lots of them to this day.

– Always walk from a fight, but never run.

– There’s a time for talking, and then there’s a time to stop talking.

– Once you get into a fight, fight to win. But even if you don’t win, you’ve got to show him (and the others) that when they mess with you there’s going to be consequences.

I recall him providing me with a strategy too. «There’s nothing ‘fair’ about this fight. This kid is two years older than you and he’s bigger than you. If you have to knee him in the nuts, then do it, and start punching him – and don’t stop until he’s on the ground.»

I remember walking back out to where all the kids were playing, and that’s how it worked out. He started shoving me around again, and I kneed him right in the nuts, and punched him in the head about five or six times as he was going down, then I turned and walked away. Everyone was shocked.

When I walked back amongst the row of RV’s, as soon as I rounded the corner, there popped out my old man (he must have been watching). I was trembling like a leaf. He just put his arm around me – never said a word to me about it, neither good nor bad – just walked with me.

Today, here in Canada, there is a great big «anti-bullying» campaign going on. All the kids are encouraged to wear pink shirts to symbolize they are against bullying, there are bullying «hotlines» set up, and every time there is a conflict between two kids, the mothers are called in to the principal’s office to «work things out.» Apparently, at
some school in Toronto, there’s a ten year old boy who decided he was gay (how can you decide you are gay when you are ten?). In order to keep this «gay» ten year old from being bullied, the school has appointed a teacher to walk around with him full-time to keep him safe. The old «schoolyard rules» have been completely abolished and we are raising our boys to be feminized sissies, not independent men confident in their own abilities.

Being bullied is part of life for men and it is important for them to learn how to stick up for themselves.

Re-framing this culturally, the boys of today are similarly being bullied by feminists. It’s a similar ‘fair’ fight. They’re bigger, smarter and they fight very dirty. And this is something this generation of boys needs to sort out themselves, because the older guys will not be around forever. Perhaps following the Masculine Principle and passing feminism’s cultural fitness-tests might be the new Rite of Passage for the boys and men of today and tomorrow.


(enlace al original en ingles)

«¿Por qué?» es una pregunta estúpida

¿Por qué? versus ¿Cómo?

Por qué es lo que nos trajo a los míticos dioses Griegos, cómo es lo que nos dio el motor a vapor.
Por qué desarrolló la idea de la igualdad de género, cómo nos permitió tener sexo usando la seducción.
Por qué es la pregunta que hace un nene de 9 años, cómo es la pregunta que hace un hombre.

Si sabes ingles, y tenes unos 30 minutos, acá tenes una charla TED donde David Deutch da una explicación sobre buenas y malas explicaciones.

Antes de la Revolución Científica, se creía que todo lo importante y conocible ya se sabía, escrito en antiguas escrituras e instituciones, y en algunas reglas de oro muy prácticas – que sin embargo estaban arraigadas de dogmas, y muchas falsedades. Así que pensaban que el conocimiento venia de las autoridades, las cuales realmente sabían muy poco. Y por lo tanto el progreso dependía de aprender a rechazar la autoridad de los hombres sabios, sacerdotes, tradiciones y gobernantes. Es por eso que la Revolución Científica tuvo que tener un contexto mas amplio.

Yo pienso que La Red Pill y la hombresfera en general sigue el mismo camino que la revolución científica. Nadie en la era de la ilustración tenia problemas de replicación en sus papers de investigación, tampoco tenían papers. Lo que hacían era intentar cosas, reportar lo que encontraban y buscarle una explicación después, simple. Si no funcionaba, al otro día leías su obituario en el diario. La clave son las explicaciones que no pueden ser modificadas para coincidir con los hechos. La red pill todavía esta en su infancia, y generalizando un poco, la hombresfera existe solo desde que maduraron los millenials, creados por la demografía que tuvo la Generación X. Esto nos llevo al hoy, donde hay un montón de por qué.

Todos esos por qué son basura, todos y cada uno de ellos.

Las mujeres son AWALT por un montón de razones

  • Padres malos
  • Validación de los Beta
  • Internet
  • Tinder
  • Divorcio sin consecuencias
  • Globalismo

¿O sea, al final de cuentas, importa realmente el por que? ¿Es algo más que simple masturbación mental? No lo veo como útil. Quizá hay alguna formula mágica, alguna legislación perfecta que haga que el mundo funcione diferente, no seriamos los primeros egomaniacos que pensamos que podemos cambiar el mundo. El tema es que el objetivo de La Red Pill no es cambiar el mundo, de hecho la imposibilidad de controlar el mundo es lo que nos motiva a entender como funciona para sacarle mayor provecho. Solo somos unos tipos compartiendo notas y observaciones.

Esta alta variabilidad es una clara señal de una mala explicación, porque sin una razón funcional para preferir una variante sobre la otra, defender una por encima de otra es irracional. En si, lo que hace a la diferencia y nos permite progresar es buscar buenas explicaciones, las que no varían fácilmente y al mismo tiempo explican el fenómeno.

De nuevo, esta es la razón por la que por que es una mala pregunta. Quizá tengas suerte y la respuesta sea la correcta, pero hay demasiadas variables, así que lo mas probable es que no tengas esa suerte. ¿Ella es AWALT por que X? Solo se necesita un tipo que le lavó la cabeza a la hija para pensar que es un hombre, o una autista con tetas para que se te caiga toda la explicación. ¿Para qué? ¿Para que puedas ignorar las obvias señales que ves a tu alrededor? Anda a cagar. Los hombres no aprendieron Seducción para aprender por qué no la estaban poniendo. Lo hicieron para aprender cómo ponerla. Y lo que vos necesitas es aprender a cómo ser hombre, preguntarle a otros hombres cómo lo hicieron, escuchá qué funcionó, y aplicalo en vos mismo.

Hacela simple, hace lo que funciona, soltá lo que no

No lo puedo simplificar más, ni hacerlo mas accionable ni mas difícil de que te mientas a vos mismo que con este consejo. Si tenes que buscar una razón para explicar por qué estas haciendo estupideces,  es porque te estas mintiendo a vos mismo. La gente no es difícil de entender, una vez que dejas de leerlas a través de tu propio ego. Las mujeres quieren el juguete del estante de más arriba, el mismo juguete que no las quiere a ellas.

Podríamos seguir por día con ejemplos. Lo único que se pone en tu camino para evitar que consigas lo que vos querés, sos vos, y tus expectativas estúpidas. Es tan simple que la gente se ríe de lo simple que es. ¿Qué? ¿Solo levantá pesas y volvete seguro de vos mismo? ¿Si no tenes una posibilidad de mínimo 50/50 ni te calentés? Ja, todo el mundo sabe eso, ¡es sentido común!. Excepto que no lo es. Todo el mundo esta seguro de si mismo, y piensa que está en forma, igual que todo el mundo empieza una pelea con un plan… el cual funciona perfecto hasta que te ponen una piña en la cara.


Deja de preocuparte por el por qué, por qué hacen lo que hacen, por qué deberías levantar pesas, cerra esa boca de maricón cuando te den ganas de llorar. Deja de pensar que tenes que convencerla de cada decisión que tomas, y de por que no podes persuadirla de que te chupe la pija mientras le contás tus planes para la casa. ¿Por que, por que, por que sos un maricón?

Basta de pensar en por qué y empezá a pensar en cómo

  • ¿Como lograr que gente valiosa te adore? Se valioso.
  • ¿Cómo logras ponerla? Se atractivo, no seas no atractivo.
  • ¿Cómo te volvés atractivo? Vestite bien, ejercitá, come bien, larga los vicios.
  • ¿Cómo evitas ser no atractivo? No llores como un maricón, se irracionalmente seguro en vos mismo, internalizá que vos sos el premio, tomá control de tu vida.

Te garantizo de que si empezás a ganar músculos, perder grasa y dejas de actuar como un nene o una mujer, el 80% del trabajo ya está hecho. Nunca me puse a pensar por qué funciona, no esta dentro del plan hacerlo tampoco.

Tu plan es ser valioso, simplemente por ser valioso, por qué es la pregunta de los vagos, porque les da una razón para dudar de las cosas, en lugar de ir y ver si funcionan por si mismos. Por qué es la pregunta que le haces a la gente mas valiosa que vos, para darte una razón para desestimar lo que te dicen, si es que siquiera te responden. La gente realmente valiosa no pierde el tiempo en un nene preguntando por qué tiene que comer vegetales, están demasiado ocupados con su propia vida.

Asi que dejá de preguntar por qué y empezá a preguntar cómo.

(enlace al original en ingles)

Mujeres – La adolescente mas responsable de la casa

Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager in the House?
***Foreword*** This piece is directly related to the previous two articles titled «You’re Such a Tool!» and «Rites of Passage – Making Boys into Men». To fully understand the significance of the following concepts, those articles must be taken into account. (While this article can stand alone, it is also the «climax» of a three part series – which is part of a chapter of a book. There’s much more context to this article than what appears here by itself).
At first it may seem like an assault against your good senses to think of adult women as mere children or teenagers. How could they be? They go through life and mature just like men do, don’t they? Once they are thirty or forty, don’t they behave as adults just as thirty or forty year old men do? Actually, there is much evidence to the contrary. Perhaps men are so keen to believe that women mature the same as them (throughout their entire lives) because in the early stages of our lives, females do actually mature faster than males.

”The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower is it in reaching maturity. Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is eight and twenty; woman when she is eighteen; but hers is a reason of very narrow limitations. This is why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling things to the most important.” — Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women (1851)
Click Pic for «You’re Such a Tool!»
The reason why females mature faster than men is not some particular triumph for them, despite how women seem to enjoy throwing this little tidbit of information around. As I described in my piece «You’re Such a Tool», what it really has to do with is women being the biological bearers and caretakers of children. They mature faster than males because once they become fertile after puberty, they must also have the mental capacity to care for the children they might bear. Nowhere in nature is there a female organism that is capable of giving birth to offspring which is not also developed enough yet to care for the offspring. This not only manifests itself in hips capable of giving birth and breasts able to produce milk, but also in a mental maturation that enables them to provide basic childcare. You will notice as well, even in our present society, it is when girls reach around the age of twelve that they begin taking up babysitting and it is around puberty when adults begin entrusting young girls to care for infants alone. This merely coincides with female biology, as it is also at that age when girls become physically capable of bearing children, and their mental maturity matches their biological maturity.

The difference between men and women in maturity, however, is that while females mature earlier in life, they also stop maturing at around the age of eighteen, as Schopenhauer aptly observes. And while men don’t catch up to women’s maturity until they reach around age twenty-eight, after that the men keep maturing – often throughout their entire lives. William James describes the same process of maturation in Principles of Psychology, where he states:

«We observe an identical difference between men as a whole and women as a whole. A young woman of twenty reacts with intuitive promptitude and security in all the usual circumstances in which she may be placed. Her likes and dislikes are formed; her opinions, to a great extent, the same that they will be through life. Her character is, in fact, finished in its essentials. How inferior to her is a boy of twenty in all these respects! His character is still gelatinous, uncertain what shape to assume, «trying it on» in every direction. Feeling his power, yet ignorant of the manner in which he shall express it, he is, when compared with his sister, a being of no definite contour. But this absence of prompt tendency in his brain to set into particular modes is the very condition which insures that it shall ultimately become so much more efficient than the woman’s. The very lack of preappointed trains of thought is the ground on which general principles and heads of classification grow up; and the masculine brain deals with new and complex matter indirectly by means of these, in a manner which the feminine method of direct intuition, admirably and rapidly as it performs within its limits, can vainly hope to cope with.» — William James, Principles of Psychology
Balvenie 50 Year Old Single Malt Scotch
It becomes like comparing three-month fermented wine served in a box of Chateau Cardboard to single malt scotch aged for decades in an oak cask. As such, women do mature faster than males but stop maturing at around the mentality of an eighteen year old (or also, I suppose, to the maturity of a 28 year old man), leaving the woman as literally, the most responsible teenager in the house.

It is interesting to note as well how many men claim that it is at around age 27 or 28 that they begin to “figure things out” in regard to women, or at least much more so than they did earlier in life.

”Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are childish, and foolish, and shortsighted – in a word, are big children all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in the strictest sense of the word. Consider how a young girl will toy day after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it; and then consider what a man, with the very best of intentions, could do in her place.” — Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women (1851)

The reason why women stop maturing at around the age of eighteen also has to do with their biological destiny as child-bearers and caretakers of children. As Schopenhauer notes, women can toy and coo with a child all day long and seemingly enjoy themselves, while what could a man do in their place? Women, as they are wont to brag to us, are also more “emotionally tuned-in” than men are. Women’s emotional proclivities are directly related to her childrearing duties which biology has assigned to her. Babies, for example, communicate solely through emotion and even as children grow into toddlers and then children that communicate with words and language, a lot of their communication is still through emotion, and so women are at an intermediate stage of development between that of a child and an adult man, or in other words, they are teenagers.

Furthermore, in regard to women’s emotional state, it ought to be noted that one cannot be emotional and rational at the same time, so it is not that females are both more emotionally in-tune while remaining rationally above it all. Just the opposite is true. The more you “emote,” the less you “think.” Take someone suffering from road-rage, for example. The emotions of anger so cloud the driver’s brain that he can even unthinkingly commit acts of violence, only to deeply regret it later when his emotions have subsided. As women are generally in a much more emotional state of mind than men, so do they not use reason and rationality to guide themselves as much as men do.

***NOTE: In regard to these concepts, there’s an addition to this article at the bottom of this page.***
What’s Mine is Mine and What’s Yours is Ours
What husband doesn’t come to understand this is the true nature of marriage after a time? But ultimately, is this not merely the same attitude that teenagers take within the family?

Think about how a teenager refers to the family sedan, which the parents paid for, as our car. But the i-pod which he purchased with money he earned part-time at McDonald’s is his i-pod. Is not the teenager’s/child’s default that his parent’s possessions are “ours” while those possessions he purchased with money he earned himself are “his,” and his alone? This directly mimics even my own parent’s marriage, where my father worked his entire lifetime to pay the bills for the family and put a roof over our heads, but when the kids were off to school and my mom took up working, the money she earned doing so was “her money.” It did not go into the family pot as my father’s income did, but became her own “special money” in almost the same way that a child’s allowance or earnings are “his money.”

(Right Now I Feel Like)…

Perhaps you have heard the old saying, “It’s a woman’s prerogative to change her mind…” This is something we usually write off as a cute quirk of female behaviour (even though it often causes untold damage to others), but think for a moment how this resembles the behaviour of children & teenagers. Ask a child what they want to be when they grow up and they will tell you “a fireman,” then ask them a week later and they will say “an astronaut.” Young people will do this right through high-school and on into university where they almost assuredly will change their major at least once, not to mention that after getting their degree, the odds are there will be more changes in their plans once again.

If I were a parent who had a teenager that told me they wanted to be a doctor in the future, I would do well to insert the phrase “Right now I feel like (I want to be a doctor),” in front of every choice the teenager has claimed they made. Certainly, I wouldn’t 100% take them at their word and start depleting my resources in an attempt to help them become a doctor, because in a month or two, the teen will tell me they no longer want to be a doctor but have decided on the career path of Famous Rock Star instead.
One of the sad facts of entering adulthood is that you are forced to make choices which you must stick to in order to be successful in your ventures. The person who decides early to stick to a career as an auto-mechanic will likely be much more successful in life than his peer who spends age 18 to 24 pursuing a career as psychologist, then quits and spends another 6 years attempting a career as an electrician, only to quit again to gain qualification as an accountant. Part of “adulthood” is about making choices that you stick to for the long term, so that those ventures have enough time to bear fruit. Those who change their minds too often rarely harvest the fruits of their labour. In other words, making a choice to go in one direction often closes the door to other choices. We allow children the latitude to change their minds as they grow-up, but after a time we start to insist they make a choice and stick to it.
Click Pic for «The Suffragettes versus The Marketplace»
Women as well change their minds like teenagers do. Sure, she might decide that (right now she feels like) she wants to be a doctor, but as evidence has shown in the medical profession, most women who train to be doctors spend less than a decade working full-time in said profession before quitting and deciding that (right now she feels like) she wants to be a mother. Afterwards, most of these women decide that (right now she feels like) she only wants to work as a part-time doctor. Of course, as time goes on, she has less and less experience than the male doctor who never “took a break” to explore other choices life had to offer and he quickly outpaces her in that field, even without the Patriarchy conspiring behind the scenes to hold her back.
Click Pic for «The Suffragettes versus The Truth»

When a woman tells you she will love you forever, insert the phrase (Right now I feel like) before it, so you get the proper translation into Womanese: “(Right now I feel like) I will love you forever. All evidence shows that this should include vows made at the altar as well, since the vast majority of divorces are initiated by women rather than men.
Q: “Do you take this man as your lawful wedded husband, to have and to hold until death do you part?”
A: “(Right now I feel like) I do!”
Sure women stick to their choices better than children do, but they don’t do it as well as men do either. In other words, women’s behaviour exists somewhere in between the child and the man… kinda like a teenager.
Women’s Fitness-Tests are Similar to the Boundaries Which Children Seek
Click Pic for «Testing, Testing… 1,2,3… Testing!»
Anyone who has raised children knows that children seek boundaries and are happiest when they find such boundaries exist and understand there are consequences when they cross them. A child who does not have boundaries set by his parents will in the short term get his way, but will ultimately come to resent everything around him and become miserable.

Women are not much different. They will instinctively fitness-test a man with all kinds of irrational and basically abusive behaviour, to test the steel content of his balls by his ability to pass such tests and not put up with her crap. If the man passes her tests, she calms down and is content to live within the boundaries of behaviour which he sets for her. Once she knows there are boundaries and her man is willing to enforce them, she knows that her man is a capable provider and protector and she can relax and feel confident following his lead.

The behaviour of children seeking boundaries set for them by their parents and the fitness-testing behaviour of women with their lovers is remarkably similar.

(Related Study Illustrating that Women Crave Boundaries)

Men Love Women, Women Love Children, and Children Love Puppies

There is an “order” to how love works and the order works only in one direction. You can see hints to this in the Bible, where husbands are commanded to love their wives while wives are commanded to “honour” their husbands in return. Children as well are commanded to honour their parents. Love is a hierarchal beast that descends downward. The only way it works in reverse is via honour and respect, because the reciprocal “love” is never equal.

A child will never love its parents in the same fashion that parents will love their child. You will readily see parents willing to sacrifice for their children – sometimes with their very lives – but rarely will you see the same in reverse. In fact, even in society as a whole, we consider it to be “the right thing” when a father or a mother sacrifices their life in order to save the life of their child. The whole of raising children to adulthood involves enormous sacrifice on the part of the parents in the form of time, frustration, freely giving resources, the denial of the parent’s dreams, and so forth. It is never returned to the parents on an equal basis, not even when the child reaches adulthood, for by that time the child will likely have children of his own to whom he bestows most of his love upon. Although having children is a one-way-street of parents sacrificing for the betterment of their child, they are still instinctively compelled to do so even though, rationally speaking, it is not in the best interests of the parents. What parents can expect in return is that their children honour them and respect them for their sacrifices – but their love will never equal that which their parents have for them. It is just not part of the natural order of life.
Click Pic for «Rites of Passage: Making Boys into Men»
In the same way, a woman’s love for a man will never be equal to a man’s love for a woman. The natural order and a woman’s hypergamous nature dictate that the man must be on a “higher level” than the woman. A man can love a woman just as a woman can love a child, but the reciprocal love is returned only in the form of honour and respect. Just as a child instinctively expects its parents to take care of them, so does a woman instinctively expect her man to take care of her. It is a one-way street. A woman will never be able to equally return a man’s love for her. At best, she can honour and respect him for what he does for her.

In fact, in the form of romantic love, you will find that women are not so much in love with the man as an individual person, but rather they are in love with the relationship. The man is merely a role-player and is easily replaced by another taking on the role. If any man expects to be an “equal partner” with his wife, he will soon find his woman disrespecting him and seeking out a man who is decidedly not her equal to lead her.

They are the sexus sequior, the second sex in every respect, therefore their weaknesses should be spared, but to treat women with extreme reverence is ridiculous, and lowers us in their own eyes. When nature divided the human race into two parts, she did not cut it exactly through the middle! The difference between the positive and negative poles, according to polarity, is not merely qualitative but also quantitative. And it was in this light that the ancients and people of the East regarded woman; they recognised her true position better than we, with our old French ideas of gallantry and absurd veneration, that highest product of Christian-Teutonic stupidity. These ideas have only served to make them arrogant and imperious, to such an extent as to remind one at times of the holy apes in Benares, who, in the consciousness of their holiness and inviolability, think they can do anything and everything they please. — Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women (1851)

You cannot expect a woman to be your true confidant, your soul-mate, and your respite to lean upon during the stormy times in life. That is your role for her benefit. It does not work in reverse, for as soon as you believe it can work that way, she will lose confidence in your ability to lead her and begin to resent you. She will go about illustrating her resentment by making your life as miserable as she possibly can. This may be one of the hardest lessons for a man to learn in life because it turns the whole notion of modern love as an equal give-and-take relationship upon its ear. The implications can be rather depressing, as it means that on a certain level a man will always be alone. A parent who expects their child to also be their equal friend to lean upon for support, will also find himself sorely disappointed with the results. The child instinctively expects the parents to be superior and to cater to his needs. Expecting the reverse will only result in a resentful child and a heartbroken parent. The same order must be maintained between a man and a woman, lest she become resentful and seek out a man who actually will lead her.

The Terrible Twos

”If one looks around at today’s culture and takes note of all the destructive effects of the female attitude of entitlement, then went on to devise social controls which would prevent such destructive effects in the future, I think you would end up with social values very much like the ones currently labeled «patriarchal.»

Rather than viewing feminism as «conditioning» women to behave in completely self-centered ways, I see it more as a case of feminism regarding the socialization process which countered the natural tendency of all organisms toward selfishness – as «oppression.»

Every parent who has had daily involvement in raising a child is familiar with the stage called «the terrible twos.» This is the stage during which the naturally selfish infant is forced to come to terms with the fact that their desires will not always be met and their will won’t always prevail. I have no doubt that if the child were able to express what it knows in its «special infantile way of knowing», that it would consider the imposition of external values on it to be «oppression.»

The vast majority of women I have met have seemed to be stuck emotionally at about age two. Any frustration of their desires would result in a tantrum. In many cases these were more subtle than throwing herself on the floor and thrashing around, but it was a tantrum nonetheless. So, rather than saying that feminism «conditioned» women to behave in an immature, selfish, and totally self-centered fashion, I would describe it as feminism destroying the social value system and the process of conditioning women out of their infantile and narcissistic world view.” — The Wisdom of Zenpriest

Your Bratty Little Sister

”… Women, then, are only children of a larger growth; … A man of sense only trifles with them, plays with them, humors and flatters them, as he does with a sprightly forward child; but he neither consults them about, nor trusts them with serious matters; though he often makes them believe that he does both; which is the thing in the world they are most proud of; for they love mightily to be dabbling in business (which by the way they always spoil); and being justly distrustful that men in general look upon them in a trifling light, they almost adore that man who talks more seriously to them, and who seems to consult and trust them; I say, who seems; for weak men really do, but wise ones only seem to do it. …» — Lord Chesterfield, Letter to His Son (1748)
In the sense of seduction, a man is well advised to treat a woman as if she were his bratty little sister:
”…The more you patronizingly treat women like bratty kid sisters, the more their vaj takes over their critical thinking skills. It all harkens back to the one fundamental principle guiding male-female relations: Chicks love submitting to powerful men. And what is a bigger demonstration of male sexual power than believing that a woman is so far beneath you that she is the equivalent of a child, hardly deserving of a serious answer or an emotional investment?

So what does “everything she does is cute” mean in practice? It means not getting riled up when she tests you. It means not explaining yourself when she stamps her wee feet and wags a finger at you. It means never acting apologetic when she’s upset with some mysterious infraction you’ve committed. Keep in mind that when a woman gets upset, at least half the time she’s not really upset with whatever misdemeanor she’s accusing you of; she’s just upset that your behavior caused a temporary reversal of gina tingle induction.

The “everything she does is cute” game tactic is defined more precisely as an inner game refinement. When you start thinking of women as adorable brats who know not what they do, you start treating them in ways consistent with your beliefs. With enough reprogramming in the right direction (i.e. kicking the supports out from under her pedestal), soon the words coming out of your mouth will be effortless verbal expressions of what you actually feel. And therein lies the secret to being a natural — naturals truly believe the charmingly jerkoff things they say to women.” — Chateau Heartiste
(Also see «Lesson Thirteen: Charm is Treating Women Like Little Girls» — The Book of Pook)

Despite what most relationship “experts” try to tell you, the key to a successful relationship is not about open, honest communication.

It is true, there must be a form of “mutual respect,” but the respect cannot be equal in all ways. A parent can respect a child and respect the child’s needs, but for a parent to treat the child as an equal would be a grave mistake. In a similar way, a man can respect a woman, but if he deems to treat her as his equal, she will soon come to resent him and leave to seek a man who actually portrays himself as superior – as a leader – to her. She seeks this instinctively. She is like water seeking a strong man to act as the container which will shape her «truths.» In the realm of seduction, a woman also seeks out a man who is able to behave in a superior fashion to her, so even if you are not yet convinced that women are as mere children but only of a larger growth, you would be well advised to treat her as one if only from the standpoint of keeping her romantically interested in you.

When a man marries a woman, he doubles his duties while halving his rights. This was true even in the days of Marriage 1.0. It is a large responsibility involving much effort to take on a wife, just as it is for one to take on raising children. You cannot expect children, or women, to fulfill your needs for emotional intimacy nor to be “someone to lean on” during times of strife. Just the opposite, for that is your duty as a parent and also as a husband.

Most of our modern laws, and nearly all of the “experts” in the social sciences, have done everything they possibly can to undermine a man’s ability to properly “husband” his wife. The current state of affairs completely upsets the natural hierarchy between man and woman. In the same way that it would be nearly impossible for parents to properly raise children if the government passed a plethora of laws deconstructing parent’s natural roles and restricting them from setting boundaries for children, so it is increasingly difficult for a man to properly fulfill his leadership role that women instinctively seek and need. When children have legal authority over their parents, chaos will ensue, just as in Marriage 2.0 where women hold supremacy over the husbands, the practice of matrimony will only harm and bring resentment to all parties involved, making one ill-advised to seek such an arrangement in life.

“Feminism starts out being very simple. It starts out being the instinct of a little child who says ‘it’s not fair’ and ‘you are not the boss of me,’ and it ends up being a worldview that questions hierarchy altogether.” — Gloria Steinem, in the two hour HBO special on the life of Gloria Steinem entitled, «Gloria: In Her Own Words.»
Previous / Index / Next
***An addition to this article*** I kind of get a kick watching this article get linked to on Reddit. It causes quite a bit of controversy and has a lot of people pretty angry, especially women. Some of their arguments are pretty silly though. The most glaring one is people calling what Schopenhauer says as «science from the 1850’s.» Umm, Schopenhauer is a philosopher, not a scientist. Learn the difference.
Your Friendly, Neighbourhood Social Justice Warrior!
Also, there is one ridiculous person in there (who goes to every reddit around to repeatedly complain about this article – for over a year now!) who continually points out that I linked to Angry Harry, «who is just another blogger like me,» and points out that AH’s «source» for «the more you emote, the less you think» is the Daily Mail. She does not point out, however, that the Daily Mail’s article she is referring to is cited by «peer reviewed research,» done by a feminist, no less, and Angry Harry merely read the research and translated what she said. Furthermore, Angry Harry has multiple degrees, a Ph D. in Psychology and the others I believe are related to childhood education – making him extremely qualified to critique the research and comment on what it means. Angry Harry often has written about how the school system has been rejigged to favour girls over boys, and it is his area of expertise to note the different brain functions of the sexes.
Further, you will quickly see how angry women get about this discussion, but not men – except for the mangina’s and white knights trying curry favour and approval from anonymous females on the internet with whom they have absolutely no chance of getting sex from – yet they still feel compelled to grovel like servile worms in front of them. My goodness, I half expect that if women gave those men a dull, rusty pocketknife, they would castrate themselves to gain the ladies’ approval. But, to note, I have not yet seen one single man get angry that this
article blatantly suggests men are more immature than women from pretty much the age of 12 to 28. (It also says males are valued less than females in society). I mean, no teenage boy nor man in his twenties takes any offense whatsoever to the suggestion that they are not as mature as their female peers, yet women and their enablers are having virtual heart-attacks over the suggestion that men may have some kind of advantage over females – somewhere.

“Men are not troubled to hear a man dispraised, because they know, though he be naught, there’s worth in others; but women are mightily troubled to hear any of them spoken against, as if the sex itself were guilty of some unworthiness.” – John Seldon (1584-1654)

And, to note, it is virtually accepted scientifically that girls do, indeed, mature faster than boys, both physically and mentally. (Which already proves the male and female brain are not the same). Physically, for example, in puberty girls mature faster than boys in such things as height. But as we all know, while boys start their growth spurt later than girls, boys grow to be significantly taller than girls. Furthermore, males also do not fully fill-out muscularly until they reach their late twenties. However, an 18 year old female is pretty much at her peak of physical development at that age, and by her late twenties is beginning to decline.
As such, those who are angry at this article are, on the one hand, acknowledging the superiority of women (they mature faster than boys) but then complaining – screeching like children actually – that there is some advantage which males will gain later in life. In other words, they are trying to show the superiority of the female brain, not its equality. If a female brain matures faster than a male’s, and also, ends up having no disadvantages but only (at the minimum) equality with the male brain thereafter, then it is quite obvious that they are claiming the female brain is superior to the male brain, because if it matures faster, and is also in every way just as capable, then it is superior because it only has advantages, but not corresponding disadvantages. This reminds me of a verse from Angry Harry’s marvelous poem, If I Only Had a V:

If I only had a V
I would use it expertly
To generate equality
That somehow always favours me

Boy, I wonder how loud the childish squealing would get if I pointed out other philosophers and writers from the past who argued things such as women’s height being between that of a child and a man, or that their facial features and skin are intermediate between a child’s and a man’s…
As someone who grew up through the brunt of feminism’s sickness in the 1970’s, 80’s and 90’s, I cannot begin to tell you how many times I have heard of the superiority of the female brain’s multi-tasking abilities. «Nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah,» the females taunted, from teenagers to old women to fat orca’s with TV talk shows. (They are still doing it today in their «A Woman’s Nation» and «End of Men» articles). Never once has it been acceptable to point out that men’s linear thinking brain is the one that is capable of intense and deep concentration, precisely because it does not multi-task, and thus why virtually all of the world’s inventions with more than two moving parts have come from the hands of men, plus the majority of great musicians, artists, philosophers and so on. Women’s multi-tasking brains are like the phrase «a jack of all trades, but master of none.» It helps them do other tasks while also tending to children. (Most women spent the majority of their entire adult lives either pregnant or caring for their children until very recently in human history). For every advantage there is a disadvantage. For every cloud, there is a silver lining. A Ferrari would be a scream for Sunday afternoon drives, but when Monday morning comes around and you need to Shut Up and Shovel the Fuckin’ Gravel, you’d probably rather have an old pick-up truck.
Click the correct vehicle to use for «The Secret to Life: Shut Up and Shovel the Fuckin’ Gravel!» — by Zenpriest
The Hard-Wired Difference Between Male and Female Brains Could Explain Why Men Are Better At Map Reading – Researchers found that many of the connections in a typical male brain run between the front and the back of the same side of the brain, whereas in women the connections are more likely to run from side to side between the left and right hemispheres of the brain. This difference in the way the nerve connections in the brain are “hardwired” occurs during adolescence when many of the secondary sexual characteristics such as facial hair in men and breasts in women develop under the influence of sex hormones, the study found. The researchers believe the physical differences between the two sexes in the way the brain is hardwired could play an important role in understanding why men are in general better at spatial tasks involving muscle control while women are better at verbal tasks involving memory and intuition.

… Because the female connections link the left hemisphere, which is associated with logical thinking, with the right, which is linked with intuition, this could help to explain why women tend to do better than men at intuitive tasks, she added. “Intuition is thinking without thinking. It’s what people call gut feelings. Women tend to be better than men at these kinds of skill which are linked with being good mothers,” Professor Verma said.

(Note that male brains run front to back, thus not crossing logic with emotion as with women).

(enlace al original en ingles)

Cómo levantarse minas muy lindas en un bar

In club/bar environments it’s often thought the most difficult approach of all is directly approaching a group of uber hot women and successful endgame of taking one home. This post demonstrates a number of methods to give these girls the good seeing too they all crave and make everyone happy in the process. The methods outlined can be deconstructed and used in isolation in various other situations, but in this case they’re usually all needed due to our quarry being in a group and all hot. Social engineering methods will run alongside psychological ones for maximum impact. The group should be of a minimum of four women and a maximum of ten, and preferably receiving a lot of passive attention from other males.

Please note: This is a meta strategy to achieve an end goal. If at any point your target shows genuine interest you can skip steps, as you’re already where you want to be (but watch for compliance tests).

Step 1: Identifying Your Targets The first step is deciding which girls you’re going to use as your gateway strategy. I say, «girls» because as well as selecting a target (your end game girl) you will also need to identify one of the other girls as a leverage point for the social dynamic aspect of the method.

[ In this case it doesn’t have to be mother hen as the status of the girls in the group is pretty similar so there’s little difference in «ranking» due to them all being 9’s or 10’s.]

The girl to use as leverage will be the girl most interested in being approached and thus most likely ascribed by the other girls unconsciously as their biggest sexual rival. To identify her, study the group carefully. Your selection will seem less interested in the inane female chit chat taking place and will tend to scan the environment, looking around to check who is in the venue (which Chads) more so than the other girls.

She’s looking to see which guys are there as it’s her intention to get laid that night. She will most likely be wearing the most revealing outfit in the group and peaking in her ovulation cycle. Possibly wearing something red or maybe just red lipstick or nails as women seem to have a predilection for the colour -combined with skimpy outfits- when they’re at their most fertile, and thus at their horniest.

[Not wearing red isn’t a deal breaker, but if you’re 50/50 over two girls in the group, then use the red wearing one as your default selection. A number of scientific studies have correlated the colour to women at their most fertile/horny. As the saying goes «Red shoes, no knickers».

Women are always checking out other girls in public venues to monitor their status in the ongoing attraction hierarchy – but if you watch – you will see that girls with red clothing or nails/lipstick receive particular attention when they’re first spotted. The other girls know full well the significance of what’s going on, even if it’s just on an unconscious level.

The other girls in the group will know this too unconsciously and attempt to engineer spoiling strategies to counter their rival. You may notice they will look at her more to check what’s she’s up to and rubberneck during conversations they’re having with the others to keep tabs on her: Watch for this.

The final sign is a body language indicator much beloved by used car salesmen and one (now that you’ve read this) you’re going to see, all the time and even notice yourself doing it to the point you say «WTF!» when you see the hidden matrix of attraction cues going on around you.

Have you ever seen two people who know each other, meet and stop in the street for a chit chat, but one needs to get away because they’re busy? Have you noticed what happens to the angle of one of their feet? It POINTS towards the direction they want to go: the direction they were originally heading, it’s unconscious body language leakage indicating an ongoing desire that’s found even in higher primates.

Good car salesmen know this too, when they’re chatting to a prospect on the lot they’re keeping a close eye on where your foot is pointing as THAT’S the car you like. Your foot points towards things you like, and away from things you don’t. We all do it, I do it, you do it and hot bitches in bars do it.

Of all the body language clues the most accurate (and only ones which can be used in isolation) are eye contact and foot pointing. When you’re stood in a bar or chatting to your buddies, the default position for you feet are the 5 minutes to 1 position. Look for girls who have a foot deviating from this stance unless there’s a good reason, then look to see where it’s pointing.

[In fact; next time you’re in a bar or club with your buddies, look towards where one of your own feet are pointing. If one of them is pointed away from its default position then it’s very likely pointing towards some hottie you have your eye on]

In Summary: The girl you are going to use as leverage to assist your entry will be exhibiting what’s known as an «R cluster».

  • Reconnaissance: She’s scanning the bar looking for which guys (Chads) are in the venue as potential partners.
  • Revealing: She will most likely be the most sexily dressed of the group.
  • Red: She will most likely be wearing the colour red.
  • Real Interest: One of her feet will be pointing away from the group and towards where her real interest lays, usually a man or group of men.

[Disclaimer: allow for pointing which may be towards the bar (she wants a drink), the toilets (she needs to pee), the dancefloor (she wants to dance) or the exit (she wants to leave) although you will only see these indicators when she’s in conversation with someone else. If she’s not engaged in something she’ll just act on what she wants without pointing ]

Under any other circumstances this is the girl whom you should target in an approach strategy; whether it be a mother hen gateway -then move to your interest- or a direct approach to your interest from off the bat. Either way this is the girl most DTF that night.

In this case however, with the group all being uber hotties this is the girl you will use as your leverage point for entry – without activating any alarm bells or bitch shields [sure you can game this girl after, once you’re established yourself ] but the purpose of this strategy is gaining access first, disqualifying yourself from your approach girl (albeit temporarily) and then use your game skills to move things on.

Your actual target girl is the next one down on the «R cluster» scale. She will be exhibiting some or all of the «R cluster» traits (though not to the extent of your leverage girl) but also target girl will be rubber necking your leverage girl as her prime sexual rival that night. Women pick up on other girls who are ovulating on an unconscious level and adjust their behaviours sub consciously by mate guarding their partner more if they have one, and cockblocking their female friends if they’re both single. You’re going to use this unconscious behavioural drive for your own ends.

Step 2: The approach. In this situation you have two types of frame. 1/ The extant frame: Group of super hotties too good for anyone in the bar and «girl power» blowing off men and acting like a pack of bitches.

2/ The intrinsic frame: The real frame, a group of sexual rivals jockeying for status, utilising devious feminine psychological methods on each other, but pretending to be best girly friends while they do it.

The problem is: An extant frame can be pretty solid due to what’s known as embodied cognition and the girls actually start acting as if this is the reality they’re in, they start feeding their emotional states off each other in a feedback loop known as «Limbic resonance» and post hoc rationalising their own behaviour (known as «Hamstering»….) to avoid cognitive dissonance.

In broscience this is called «Believing your own shit». A radical deframe is required. Gentlemen, such a deframing exists.

«The Queens Of Sheba Opener.»

Internalise your RP mindset as the selector and approach your target girl direct (ensure she has a full drink as you don’t want any distractions or default «drink tooling» programs firing up). Make sure she sees you are approaching so you don’t trigger an auto pilot response by surprising her, then stop in front of her as if weighing her up for a few seconds, then ask the question.

«Who’s your friend?»

She’ll be expecting a chat up line or random beta validation, but gets surprise instead (the type we DO need) which derails normal shit testing programming (we’re also generating an emotional response here, which is good) but curiosity will make her ask…

«Which one?» [ that’s why we need a minimum of 4 girls in the group ].

With a nod of your head towards your leverage girl reply…

«The one all the guys are interested in»

This is a huge deframe. There she is enjoying all this attention and validation, then all of a sudden the rug is pulled from under her: The attention and validation may not actually be for her!

Hamster central rapidly boots up to protect her self-image.

«The guys are looking at all of us….?»

«Is nobody actually interested in me and it’s actually my friend that’s creating all this interest from guys…?»

«I’m beautiful, but is she so much more attractive than me that all these guys don’t care?»

«Am I the least attractive of my friends…?»

«What the fuck is my status in the group…?»

All these thoughts go through her head in a split second as you’ve just triggered an «imposter syndrome» program to run in her mind. Not only that, but the source of it is her prime sexual rival who she unconsciously ascribes as a threat.

Oh fucking dear…

Her status is now in limbo and needs a reference point to stabilise itself so her limbic brain creates a sense of dread causing her to reframe from the bottom up to achieve some stability to build from. The dread is hard-wired into her brain: In the ancestral environment a rapid change in circumstances could mean imminent danger or a big survival opportunity. The limbic brain doesn’t trust your pre-frontal cortex (the conscious) to deal with it so pulls rank and drops into heuristic mode.

Heuristics are nothing more than pre-wired emotional responses on how to deal with something quickly. They come from the emotional brain and are combinations of responses based on previous similar experiences (the social emotions like, shame, guilt, jealousy etc) with some actually hard-wired into the brain’s source code (like fear, anger, lust etc ). When these heuristics are running then you’re also susceptible to influence, as you’re locking onto someone else’s frame as a scaffolding to bring you back to normality/stasis and the «emotional traffic highway» is now open for emotions coming in the opposite direction (from the other person).

Your frame as selector and alpha is incorporated into her own.

[ To the vast majority of girls «status» within their peer group (which used to be the tribe) is of considerable importance as it had to be kept a close eye on in the ancestral environment to maximise the potential of mating with the highest alpha male they could get. It had to be monitored at all times and like I said action taken to avoid any potential loss and seize on the opportunity for any potential improvement.]

With very hot girls status is even more important as being «top girl» was the genetic jackpot for their genes. These girls now pretty much have everything, the looks, the orbiters, the protectors, and all the other benefits which come from being an uber hottie. The one thing they have to work for is their status/value with other uber hotties in their group/tribe.

Lost at sea she now starts to do something she very rarely does: She starts qualifying herself to you and sabotaging her rival.

Step 3: The Lock In

Important If you start validating her now, then any potential attraction will disappear very quickly. Remember this as you will have an urge to do so.

The behaviour you drop into now is that of «amused mastery» with a heavy emphasis of skepticism. Cross your arms when she’s validating herself, but listen to the criteria she’s basing herself judged worth upon. See if you can find an adjective she seems keen on which you can use to preface the word «Confident». When you’ve identified the word then make sure to slightly nod when you hear it (more about this later, but it’s to do with what are called «trancewords».) The nod is a way of analogically marking it through body language so that its significance is processed unconsciously, as body language is decoded by the unconscious brain first and the conscious secondly, but only if it appears to be incongruous will the conscious boot up to give it «due process».

Keep a wry amused smile on your face, she will sense that you’re not taking the bait and most likely go some light kino on you to punctuate her emotional state and expect you to invest with some validation. Kino her back, but always in a pushing fashion and don’t look where you touch (it’s creepy). Because of her emotional state your kino won’t be processed at a conscious level as the cognitive buffer is filled with other concerns, but unconsciously it’s getting through to her attraction centres.

Step 4 The Lock Down The key now is to drop her out of her emotional state temporarily and then spike it back up again using a process known as «refractionation». Basically when someone comes out and then back into the same emotional state, the second time they go into it, it’s more powerful. It’s a method used by the «speed seduction» community to generate high levels of arousal in a woman, but in this case we’re just using it for a different emotional model to suit our strategy.

Uncross your arms with a sigh, relax and then change the subject to something mundane going on in the venue as if you’re just chatting to one of your buddies. Men do not do this to uber hotties as their usual remit is to try to impress them. She will think you’ve disqualified her (causing slight confusion) as a potential partner and up your ascribed value in her mind. Carry on the conversation for about a minute and then drop the line. «Actually you have three big advantages over your friend» (leverage girl).

[Credit for this goes once again to Mystery and was originally known as the «Three Things About You Technique». Its methodology was to tell a girl two things about herself attraction wise that she didn’t know, but not the third. The PUA could then either go sarge other girls or go to the washroom or bar knowing he had inoculated the girl from further approaches by other guys hanging around as she always wanted to find out the third.]

It uses a cognitive bias we all have known as the «Zeigernic effect» and is very effective [I can vouch for its impact as I’ve had girls come to a bar they knew I was going next, wait outside a wash room for me, and even been pulled out of a taxi to find out the elusive third thing.]

The Three Things: This time, however we’re going to use the «things» as vehicles for some pretty devious and cunning psychological deep mind influence.

When she asks what they are, use the ones below and make sure to preface the first with the words «The first one is». This is to create a language pattern known as an *»Ordinal».

An «Ordinal» is a presupposition that there will be a number of things. By using the word «first» you’re implying that there will be a second, third, etc. The second, third may not even exist, but the listener presupposes that they do as you used the word «first».

[ The woman already knows there will be three things, but in this case you’re using it a reinforcer to prevent cognitive drift ]

Then use the word «Because». «Because» is a statement as opposed to a question and various studies have discovered the word as a preface generates more influence from the speaker. This is because the laws of cause and effect are programmed into all higher animal brains, but by using the word at the beginning of our list (use it only for the first thing) and going through the list in this order, we are starting a process called *»State Titration» so each separate «thing» titrates into the next one, making the process seamless and generating *»cognitive fluency» to prevent her critical factor booting up.

[Count them off on your fingers as you do so. In this way you’re again using a body language cue to anchor them.]

1/ » The first thing is because….» Then a comment on her appearance, but not anything physical. It’s important that it’s something which you genuinely like as the very fact that you have spotted it means it will be something which she wore for that purpose. Something like her dress or shoes making her look «classy» or «sophisticated» as if these are essential criteria for you in a partner (if you DO have essential criteria then use those instead as it will help your congruence).

She will see this as an advantage she has over her fellow beauty leverage girl and mentally agree.

You have just started what’s known as a «Yes Set» (getting her mind into the house of yes) to ease the next two things through.

2/ A comment on how she’s a friendly girl and not standoffish. The reason for this is you’re «priming» the «friendly» behaviour mindset (by «half cocking» the relevant network of neurons» ) into her brain, so she will more likely to act friendly and less keen to start shit testing you. Because you’ve already got her brain into yes mode (the essence of the «yes set») from your first statement and you’re titrating emotional state, her critical factor (the pre-frontal cortex) usually lets the idea into her mind without much introspection. ( No need to use «because» or «The …….thing is», from now on as their work is done ).

3/ Now we use the most Machiavellian attraction trigger in existence…

The Amygdala Feedback Loop.

But first some background. You may have noticed I’m a big proponent of «embodied cognition». This is for good reason. It’s commonly reasoned that when the mind wants the body to do something, it sends a signal to cause the result it requires. This is true, but only half the story. When the body commits the action the mind requests, it sends a signal back to the brain to announce its new state. The brain analyses the return signal and tweaks its instructions in a feedback loop to fine-tune everything and achieve maximum efficiency.

However…if you consciously induce that state in yourself or someone else then the unconscious picks up the return signal and assumes that the signal is the current «state of play» of how things are, and sychronises itself to it, feeding back the new mental model to the body in an ever strengthening loop until the new state becomes the new reality.

There’s been a lot of research into this and the original model was proven by researchers who asked test volunteers to read jokes with and without a pencil held in their mouth. They discovered that the volunteers found the jokes funnier with the pencils then without them.


Holding the pencil in the mouth requires the face to use the «Zygomatic major muscle» to do so. This muscle is also the one which unconsciously triggers when we smile. The brain senses that the muscle is triggering and infers that activity is happening in the body which correlates to a happy/funny state. Instead of the feedback loop going «brain to body to brain to body….» it begins at the state of the «body» instead. The mind adopts the state of the body (happy) to avoid dissonance and the new state becomes the norm, but in this case… You find the jokes funnier.

So…we trigger a behaviour in the girl which correlates to her being attracted to someone.


Sometimes however, this feedback loop runs out of control and can actually cause a panic attack. Calibrate her state closely at this time as any other emotions ongoing in her psyche can hitch a ride on the loop, and some girls can go really crazy when this happens. We’re running a pure attraction loop and nothing else here so be careful what you’re doing.

We count off our third finger, look her in the eye, pause, and then say……

«The third thing is you make lots of very confident eye contact».

Why? Because very attractive girls are very adept at avoiding eye contact with random guys who constantly try to make it with them. If they didn’t, then they would have no end of loser types she has no interest in approaching her and wasting her time.

The only guys she *does make eye contact with, are guys she is interested in or attracted to. You’ve induced a state of attraction in her as she will now adopt that behaviour with you. The body is saying to the brain «I’m making a great deal of eye contact with this guy» so her mind says «Ok that must mean I am attracted to him, so make more of the same» and the feedback loop continues.

The reasons she adopts the behaviour are.

1/ She’s in validation mode with you as her sexual rival is stealing her thunder; she wants it back and if eye contact is an ace up her sleeve, then so be it.

2/ She’s in the final stage of a «yes set».

3/ Do you remember the bit about «trancewords» earlier? Trancewords are words (usually adjectives) based on a person’s sense of values. These values are an actual part of someones identity at their most powerful. When she’s stating her case for being more attractive/desirable than her rival she’s using what she considers her main advantages over her.

They could be: «I’m more passionate», «classy», «sophisticated», «deep», «seductive» etc.

So the final push to get this behaviour through to her limbic brain is to utilise a value which has already been «preapproved» by her unconscious as being important to her. This is a technique known as «tailgating». You take a value very close to another person’s belief model, link it to the value/behaviour you wish to induce and the very association of the latter to the former stamps the signal approved for access to limbic brain to the package as a whole. Into her mind it goes to be unwrapped back into its two separate values once it’s arrives.

Machiavellian? Totally. Manipulative? Absolutely.

So….For the final push… with a slight nod (our earlier state anchor) we say…

«You make very confident (insert trance word here) eye contact».

Step 5: Welcome To My Frame

This stage is the stage to drop her totally out of her frame and into yours. You invite her into your territory. One of the remits of an alpha male in the entire animal kingdom is that they have their own territory. In this case, it would either be where you were originally stood if you’re on your own, or back to your wingmen/wingman if you’re in a group. By doing so you’re demonstrating territorial, attraction generating cues at the very deepest parts of her limbic mind. That’s the place (amygdala) where the values «Fight, Feed, Fuck» reside.

This is deep core and the place you want to be.

Step 6: How The World Is

If you’re on your own, then project the emotional behaviour and frame that’s she’s a plate that you’re very fond of (mentally not verbally) and run with that, with the odd unpredictable intercession (this refractionates but also loads up her cognitive buffer to keep the unconscious highways clear).

If you’re with your buddies then brief them before the approach on what to do when you bring the girl over. A good first thing for one of them to say is.

«Are we staying or are we going?»

By doing this you indicate to her that you’re the leader of your group (the alpha) but also imply a «scarcity» mindset in her so she will infer that you may actually be leaving (after all this chemistry!) and make her invest more.

You of course reply…

«I haven’t decided yet»

The mindset your group should now operate on, is as if she’s a girlfriend you’ve been dating a while, but they’ve just met her. The group frame that this is the reality in question will permeate unconsciously and eliminate any residual frame she has (people drop into the strongest frame they’re interacting with 95% of the time).

No doubt the buddies will be looking for a piece of the action too, in which case ask her a female opinion on something then get her to invite one of her friends over to back her up. Now her group is splitting, some of your guys can go over and chat to the remaining ones. Top R cluster girl is your best bet here for ease of entry.

After that is up to you, but the goal you want is to separate and isolate all the girls into groups of two (two girls-two wingmen) then run with it, with the end goal of bouncing in pairs to the next venue, but keep your frame tight at all times.

End Note

The most important thing about this method is YOU. In all human interactions, people send out what could be called «reality pings» like a submarine’s sonar. These «pings» detect the frame of an ongoing interaction and who’s going to drop into whose frame. The pings happen on an unconscious level and give an emotional valence to the frame at hand. Most people know about body language communication at a meta level, but below that there are tiny nuances in behaviour and physiology called «BMIRs». This stands for *Behavioural Manifestations Of Internal Representations».

BMIR’s are impossible to consciously fake and also very difficult consciously to detect. They just give us a gut feeling about someone (although the American secret service does train its agents using some BMIRs called «Facial Action Cues» [Micro gestures of the face which last only 300 milliseconds] developed by a guy called Paul Ekman so it can be done.

Alas we don’t have access to this level of training but there is a fast track method.

Genuinely believing your TRP frame and knowing 100% that the method will work. When you do that your BMIRs are a 100% reflections of your intentions and mental frame. The woman gets the «feelz» about you on an unconscious level. Her «reality pings» are mapping your psyche and getting the thumbs up (it’s based on the «limbic resonance» I covered earlier). Hypnotists utilise the concept by what’s called «going first». They adopt the emotion they wish their subject to have, the subject picks up the BMIRs of the emotion, their mirror neurons inject it into their own «global-workspace» and they feel the emotion themselves.

Remember though: In field is chaos at the best of times with people coming in and out of set and a great deal of distractions (Mobile phones!) but the greater the integrity of your frame (your force field) the less effect these things will have.

TL;DR Look up the bit about foot pointing. It’s the matrix unveiled of attraction intentions.

(enlace al original en ingles)

Algunos ejemplos de seducción para aplicar ya mismo


… y apagá tu cabeza, imagina que te la esta chupando y hablá.

¡Dominá la logística!

  • Conoce los lugares copados de comida (Pizza, café, tacos, etc)
  • Conoce los parques o lugares donde puedas caminar y pasear después de comer

¡Siempre avanzá! Así debería verse la progresión de la noche.

  • Te acercaste
  • La calentaste (polariza)
  • Conseguiste numero / Próxima salida
  • Andate de ahí

Todo el proceso debería tomar menos de 5 minutos. Si no, es muy muy probable que la estés cagando.

Decir «hola» toma cero esfuerzo, y empezar la charla es el 99% del problema. PROBLEMA RESUELTO. (ademas, las «frases» de levante son una pedorreada)

Probablemente puedas desarmar mi argumento y decir algo como que si no sos lindo/alto/dotado/etc no sirve de nada, que se yo. Esa misma es la razón por la que estas acá, no? Es la razón por la que estas leyendo este articulo, no?. El problema es que pensás demasiado. Vos, yo, todos somos terribles cuando la pensamos demasiado. Por suerte ahora durante el levante pienso tan poco que apenas puedo acordarme de la interacción y cuando intento contársela a algún amigo termino sonando como un mogólico que se trata de levantar un árbol.

Me acerco 5 veces al día y es genial. Es natural, es humano y es algo importante para mi. Me siento un hombre seguro y saludable, si me rechaza no es por mi, no es mi culpa y le agradezco que no me haya hecho perder el tiempo. No hay chances de que sin hacer nada un día te despiertes y mágicamente seas bueno seduciendo, es como los músculos, los tenes que entrenar. Siempre tené en mente que en 50 años vas a estar muerto así que dejá de ser un cagón.

Las bases de la seducción de día #01

Hace tiempo cuando estudiaba técnicas de Chamullo me encontré con un artículo llamado «La estrategia del impacto sorpresivo».

En resumen es simplemente saltearte toda la demás boludez de levante y en cuanto ella empiece a dar indicaciones de interés (IDI) simplemente sugerí de ir a su casa o la tuya.

Ya te digo que esto funciona re bien. La primera mesera HB8 que me gané fue gracias a que le sugerí ir a su casa a dormir la resaca en cuanto dijo algo de que sea cuidadoso de no emborracharme mucho.

Por supuesto que la respuesta fue «No se si esa es una buena idea», y eso me dijo a mi que no le disgustaba tanto la idea. No dije mas nada. Esta parte es la mas importante. Simplemente me paré ahí mirándola mientras ella procesaba la idea. Y entonces dijo «no vamos a hacer nada eh».

Fuimos a su casa y corrió a la pieza, volvió con una remera y bombachita. Ni me tuve que esforzar. Básicamente la mina se me tiró encima y empezó a darme. Ja.

Todas y cada una de las chicas que alguna vez me dijeron «no vamos a hacer nada eh» estaba tanto caliente como equivocada.

El «Impacto Sorpresivo» (Shock and Awe) es:

Vos: «¿Que vas a hacer después?»
Ella: «No se…»
Vos: «Venís a mi casa?»
Vos: Callate la boca boludo y trata de parecer lo mas seguro y confianzudo posible.
Ella: Básicamente trata de decidir si sos un asesino serial o no, así que no hay espacio para verse raro ni nervioso ni enfermito.

Supuestamente funciona el 25% de las veces porque requiere unos huevos enormes. Si sabes ingles, buscá «Bristol Lair» y «Shock and Awe»

Cómo enfrentas el «¿En serio te pensás que me voy a ir a casa con el primer tipo que me lo pide?» O el «¿Le decís eso a todas las minas?

Primera pregunta: «No veo a nadie mas preguntando (sonrisa socarrona)»
Segunda pregunta: «Solo a las lindas (sonrisa socarrona)»

Controlá el relato

El hecho de que alguien te haya hecho una pregunta no quiere decir que tengas que responderla.

No vamos a hacer nada hoy

Cuando una mina te dice

«mirá que hoy no va a pasar nada»

Quiere decir: «Ya se me paso por la cabeza la idea de hacerlo con vos y ahora que ya tengo tu pene en mi mente probablemente terminemos haciéndolo, pero tengo que aparentar de que no lo pensé así no parezco muy fácil… yyyyyy ya estamos cogiendo«.

Empezar con una pregunta de opinión es útil para aprender ‘seducción’

Es muy útil al principio por ejemplo «¿Por que pensás que los perros se chupan el pito?»

Pero una vez que ya te sentís mas cómodo, te vas a ir dando cuenta de que no importa lo que digas, te podes levantar una mina con empezar diciéndole algo tan simple como «¿hola, que tal?»

¡No se que decir!

Yo: «Hola»
Ella: «Hola
Ehm… necesitabas algo?»
Yo: «Eh…. no se que mas decir, pero uf que labios carnosos que tenes! Se me esta parando de imaginar lo que podes hacer con eso»
Ella: «Voy a llamar a la policía»
Yo: «Mierda se ve que sigo pensando demasiado»


Ahi es donde la estas cagando. A las minas les chupa un huevo de lo que hables. Las mujeres no tienen conversaciones ni procesan las cosas como los hombres. Muchas veces simplemente hablan porque les gusta hablar, todo el aspecto de ser social, en serio, no hay nada mas allá que eso.

¿Me callo o hablo?

El silencio es bueno, callate

¿Que se supone que haga? ¿Me callo o hablo para levantarmela? ¡Demasiada información contradictoria!

¿Alguna vez trabajaste en ventas?

Te muestro dos ejemplos

Ejemplo 1:

Ofreces tu propuesta, y te callas la boca.
Esperas, porque le toca responder a la otra parte.
Pero antes de que responda, es común que haya un pequeño período de un silencio incómodo.
(es porque la otra parte esta buscando la mejor respuesta/estrategia a tu propuesta)

No podes controlar como responden, pero podes controlar no aparecer desesperado, si te callas la boca apareces como seguro de tu propuesta. Así que acordate – se puede expresar seguridad y confianza utilizando el silencio, en el escenario apropiado.

Pero, imaginate el contraste con el

Ejemplo 2:

Ofreces tu propuesta.
Instantáneamente después, en lugar de callarte y ser paciente…
Le saltas a la yugular a la otra persona ofreciéndole razones por las cuales debería «comprar» lo que ofreciste, tratando de justificar tu proposición.

¿Cual parece desesperada, ejemplo 1 o 2?

Si nunca fuiste vendedor, y si la vida te lo permite, trata de conseguir algo por unos meses. Te va a abrir los ojos y vas a aprender un montón de habilidades sociales (manejo social, manipulación, como abrir a las personas, como cerrar tratos, como encauzar conversaciones hacia el objetivo que tengas en mente, etc).

Algo mas que el silencio hace y que es muy importante: El silencio le da gravedad a tus palabras.

Si decís menos palabras que los demás en una conversación, las palabras que digas se perciben como de mayor importancia, con mayor significancia, mas poderosas, siempre asumiendo que vos y la otra persona son pares en cuanto a estatus social. El tema es que al decir menos palabras, lo que decís recibe mas atención y peso y se va a terminar percibiendo como de mayor calidad.

Cuanto menos hablas, mas poderosas van a ser tus palabras, simplemente por haber menos de ellas.

Cuanto menos cosas hay, mas atención se le puede prestar a cada una – es pura teoría del diseño. Un grupo grande de boludeces – por ejemplo cervezas en un menú – si un bar tuviera 80 cervezas en el menú, sería una sobrecarga lease Sobrecarga de elecciones, también conocido como la paradoja del a elección. No vas ni a ver ni a recordar a la mayoría de ellas. Pero, si solo hay 4 cervezas – ahora le podes dar a cada una mas atención individual, y sopesar el peso de la decisión que te toca hacer. El desorden va totalmente en contra de la atención – solo genera distracción. El silencio «reduce el desorden» en el sentido de que como estas hablando y diciendo menos cosas, lo que decís recibe mas atención.

Vivimos en una economía de la atención

Nos bombardean a diario con publicidades, así que las apagamos mentalmente. Es un simple ejemplo de atención selectiva.

Por ejemplo las aulas muy decoradas se sabe que suelen distraer a los estudiantes (buscalo). Vemos este efecto por todas partes, es una parte de nuestra naturaleza.

Cuanto menos hay de una cosa, más atención recibe cada unidad individual de esa cosa.

Cuanto más hay de una cosa, menos atención recibe cada unidad individual de esta.

Bastante lógico, ¿No es cierto?

El silencio esta bien una vez que ya generaste una conexión. Incluso esta bien usarlo desde temprano siempre que haya una parte de la charla donde ella pueda responder naturalmente (ej. si le ofreces tu opinión sobre algo, una pausa suele ser una señal para que ella participe y responda). Pero si es justo al mismo inicio – sin conexión, sin siquiera un tema de conversación en la mesa – entonces ahí es donde necesitas tirar algo de charla.

¿De que hablo entonces?

Y sobre la pregunta de qué es ese «algo«, suelo elegir temas mundanos de entrada (si te la sigue con un tema mundano es una buena señal de que le interesas vos mas que cualquier tema súper interesante o súper divertido que puedas elucubrar). Después de un rato de charla mundana pregunta hace cuanto esta en la ciudad, o si viene seguido a esa zona de salidas, que partes de la ciudad conoce, y para entonces ya estas hablando de bares, restaurantes, parques, teatros, etc. Y ahí es muy muy fácil llevarla a un «vayamos a conocer _____ el Jueves».


  1. Boludeces mundanas (ej. el tiempo, posta)
  2. Hace cuanto vivís por acá / Venís mucho a este lugar
  3. Que partes de la ciudad conoces
  4. Sugerí salir a algún lugar que no conozca / que le guste

Simplificalo tanto como puedas.

Antes de ponerte loco con este articulo, recordá que si tu físico es una mierda, tu sentido del a moda es un desastre y si no tenes un mínimo cuidado en tu cabello / barba, no importa lo que hagas, al menos en cuanto a levantarte minas por encima del HB4.

¿Polarizar? ¿De qué hablas?

¿Que quiere decir eso? ¿Quiere decir que después de demostrar valor onda confianza, humor, etc, tenes que decirle algo sexual para ver su reacción?

Quiere decir esto:

Demostrá valor – Mostrá un buen relato, acercate y saludala

Entabla Contacto Físico – Kino, mano en los hombros, agarrale la mano, abrazala.

Alimenta Dependencia – Se su guía, su organizador de la noche, pero acordate es TU show, no el de ella.

Negala Emocionalmente – No demuestres debilidad, puede llorar en los hombros de un amigo, NO en los tuyos.

Ilusionala – Deja pistas de futuras mejoras en al relación, por ejemplo una revista de matrimonio tirada por ahí. Nunca seas directo, dejá que sea solo cosas de su imaginación.

Separa las cosas – Nunca te cases, esa es onda la regla #1 de todas.

(en ingles se conoce como método DENNIS)